Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date
Msg-id 20230116.120307.1055288243096760255.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:01:43 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:16 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Although I don't see a technical difference between the two, all the
> > other occurances including the just above (except test_shm_mq) use
> > "could not". A faint memory in my non-durable memory tells me that we
> > have a policy that we use "can/could not" than "unable".
> >
> 
> Right, it is mentioned in docs [1] (see section "Tricky Words to Avoid").

Thanks for confirmation.

> Can you please start a new thread and post these changes as we are
> proposing to change existing message as well?

All right.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs