On 2024-Mar-31, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +uint64
> +pg_popcount_avx512(const char *buf, int bytes)
> +{
> + uint64 popcnt;
> + __m512i accum = _mm512_setzero_si512();
> +
> + for (; bytes >= sizeof(__m512i); bytes -= sizeof(__m512i))
> + {
> + const __m512i val = _mm512_loadu_si512((const __m512i *) buf);
> + const __m512i cnt = _mm512_popcnt_epi64(val);
> +
> + accum = _mm512_add_epi64(accum, cnt);
> + buf += sizeof(__m512i);
> + }
> +
> + popcnt = _mm512_reduce_add_epi64(accum);
> + return popcnt + pg_popcount_fast(buf, bytes);
> +}
Hmm, doesn't this arrangement cause an extra function call to
pg_popcount_fast to be used here? Given the level of micro-optimization
being used by this code, I would have thought that you'd have tried to
avoid that. (At least, maybe avoid the call if bytes is 0, no?)
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El Maquinismo fue proscrito so pena de cosquilleo hasta la muerte"
(Ijon Tichy en Viajes, Stanislaw Lem)
