Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases
Date
Msg-id 20241115143217.43.nmisch@google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Noah Misch
> > I'm hearing the only confirmed impact on non-assert builds is the need to
> > recompile timescaledb.  (It's unknown whether recompiling will suffice for
> > timescaledb.  For assert builds, six PGXN extensions need recompilation.)
> 
> Which 6 extensions are these?
> 
> I re-ran the tests on all the extensions on apt.pg.o and didn't see
> any failures (timescale and age are already rebuilt).

I counted wrong, it's the five here:
https://postgr.es/m/20241114143524.91.nmisch@google.com

They are AGE and the four others you found not to be part of apt.pg.o.
(timescaledb is not part of PGXN, so it's not one of the five.)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ryohei Takahashi (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: doc: pgevent.dll location
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)