On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:30:17 +0100
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-09-13 at 16:18 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > I've attached a updated patch. The test is rewritten using has_largeobject_privilege()
> > function instead of calling loread & lowrite, which makes the test a bit simpler.
> > Thare are no other changes.
>
> When I tried to apply this patch, I found that it doesn't apply any
> more since commit f391d9dc93 renamed tab-complete.c to tab-complete.in.c.
>
> Attached is a rebased patch.
Thank you for updating the patch!
> I agree that large objects are a feature that should fade out (alas,
> the JDBC driver still uses it for BLOBs). But this patch is not big
> or complicated and is unlikely to create a big maintenance burden.
>
> So I am somewhat for committing it. It works as advertised.
> If you are fine with my rebased patch, I can mark it as "ready for
> committer". If it actually gets committed depends on whether there
> is a committer who thinks it worth the effort or not.
I confirmed the patch and I am fine with it.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
