Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Date
Msg-id 20250624.084431.1321911925805719841.ishii@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>> Do we know which implementations aren't sending keys?
> 
>> Nope, that's totally unclear. It would be very nice knowing which
>> database this is, and if it's at all a production system.
> 
> Yeah, I'm very hesitant to spend any effort here without having
> a more concrete use-case.

One example is Amazon RDS Proxy.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/rds-proxy.html

See the section:
"Additional limitations for RDS for PostgreSQL"

I haven't tried Amazon RDS Proxy myself but I heard about it in a
conversation with a Pgpool-II user. He tried to use Pgpool-II with
Amazon RDS Proxy and failed.

https://github.com/pgpool/pgpool2/issues/111

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Logrep launcher race conditions leading to slow tests