On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/
> and saw plenty of "Active patches" there.
>
> I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1].
I don't know about the rest of it, but I moved all the entries in the
"Bug Fixes" category to the PG19-2 commitfest.
As for the others:
> Are they supposed to stay like that? Should they be closed?
> If yes, "Returned with Feedback"? Or some new state "Abandoned"?
> [1]: https://postgr.es/m/003e3a66-8fcc-4ca0-9e0e-c0afda1c9424%40eisentraut.org
I *think* we should close the Waiting-on-author ones as Returned with
Feedback, and ping the authors of the rest so that each author moves
their patches forward, with a reasonable deadline (two weeks?); we close
patches that aren't moved by then.
Right now we have:
Waiting on author: 14 patches
Needs review: 13 patches
Ready for committer: 4 patches
It's not a lot.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
