On 2025-Sep-12, Noah Misch wrote:
> The last argument gives the dump object on which the comment has a dependency.
> Since this is the case of a separately-dumped constraint, the comment needs to
> depend on that constraint (coninfo), not on the domain (tyinfo):
>
> - coninfo->dobj.catId, 0, tyinfo->dobj.dumpId);
> + coninfo->dobj.catId, 0, coninfo->dobj.dumpId);
>
> I didn't encounter a failure from this, but sufficient restore parallelism
> might reach a failure. A failure would look like a "does not exist" error in
> the COMMENT command, due to the constraint not yet existing.
> dumpTableConstraintComment() is an older case that optimally handles the last
> dumpComment() arg.
Sounds sane.
> In the absence of objections, I'll make it so.
Please do, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/