Thank you for the report!
> Coverity is not very happy with this patch.
> It's complaining that the result of window_gettupleslot
> is not checked, which seems valid:
>
> 1503 {
> 1504 if (fetch_tuple)
>>>> CID 1666587: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN)
>>>> Calling "window_gettupleslot" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 8 out of 9 times).
> 1505 window_gettupleslot(winobj, pos, slot);
> 1506 if (!are_peers(winstate, slot, winstate->ss.ss_ScanTupleSlot))
> 1507 return -1;
Yes, I forgot to check the return value of window_gettupleslot.
> and also that WinGetFuncArgInPartition is dereferencing
> a possibly-null "isout" pointer at several places, including
>
>>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout".
> 3806 if (*isout) /* out of partition? */
>
>>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout".
> 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark)
> 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos);
>
>>>> Dereferencing null pointer "isout".
> 3817 if (!*isout && set_mark)
> 3818 WinSetMarkPosition(winobj, abs_pos);
>
> The latter complaints seem to be because some places in
> WinGetFuncArgInPartition check for nullness of that pointer
> and some do not. That looks like at least a latent bug
> to me.
Agreed.
Attached is a patch to fix the issue.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp