Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns
Date
Msg-id 202510081001.zjytakz6rdh3@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_createsubscriber --dry-run logging concerns
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Oct-08, Peter Smith wrote:

> I am not wedded to doing this double-messaging... if people feel just
> the one-time logging at the beginning is enough, then that is OK by
> me.

Some other tools (not Postgres ones) do that and it always makes me
nervous, because I can never be sure which parts were actually done and
which parts are only dry-run trials.  I'd rather stay away from that
approach.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Cómo puedes confiar en algo que pagas y que no ves,
y no confiar en algo que te dan y te lo muestran?" (Germán Poo)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
Next
From: Arseniy Mukhin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Write Notifications Through WAL