On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 09:41:00PM +0100, Mihail Nikalayeu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 12:21 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > Thanks. Does "ON CONFLICT ON CONSTRAINT constraint_name" avoid the problem w/
> > concurrent REINDEX CONCURRENTLY? A search of the thread found no mention of
> > "ON CONSTRAINT". It seems safe to assume that clause would avoid problems w/
> > CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, but that's less certain for REINDEX.
>
> It is also affected. There is a special
> reindex_concurrently_upsert_on_constraint spec in the patch.
> And even a special commit (0004) to fix it :)
My mistake. I've redone the mbox search that I thought I had done. That
search should have found it yesterday, so I must have made a typo then.
> I removed the mention of "ON CONSTRAINT" and added a small comment
> near infer_arbiter_indexes.
>
> Doc patch is 0001, other - specs and fixes for future.
I re-flowed the new comment to the standard 78 columns and pushed 0001.
Thanks.