Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 20663.1147984591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for
>> short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed
>> source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold
>> his or her nose and use MySQL.
>> 
> If we had infinite resources this might make sense. We don't, so it 
> doesn't. There is a real cost to producing a compatibility layer, and 
> the cost will be those spiffy new features.

The real problem is that there's a whole lot of stuff, such as mysql's
weak error checking, that I don't think a "compatibility layer" could
sanely provide.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Dean
Date:
Subject: Toward A Positive Marketing Approach.
Next
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?