Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean, - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean,
Date
Msg-id 2096.1170170233@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean,  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Guido Goldstein wrote:
>> Is it possible to tell me which python versions you want to
>> support?

> There are still products shipping with 2.3 (e.g. RHEL4). I'd be 
> surprised if we need to go back before that.

As far as Red Hat is concerned, we won't be trying to get PG 8.3 and up
to run on anything older than RHEL4, so python 2.3 is old enough.  Not
sure how the release timing has worked out for other distros ... but the
presence of python 2.3 in the buildfarm says to me that it's still
fairly popular.

[ digs a bit more... ]  Actually, it looks like Fedora Core 1 shipped
with python 2.2.3, which means that's what buildfarm member "thrush"
is running.  So you probably don't want to break 2.2 either, at least
not for a basically cosmetic patch.  I don't say that we'd reject a
patch that breaks 2.2 compatibility, but you'd need to put forth a
sufficient justification.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files