Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes:
> But think about the inheritance case again: suppose
> create table p (f1 int);
> create table c (f2 int) inherits (p);
> Now you just change your mind and want to drop p but not c. You can't
> do it because f1 is the last column on it, and c inherits it. So a way
> to drop the last column inherited (thus freeing the dependency on p)
> makes c independent, and you can drop p.
Hmm, no I don't think so. Parent-to-child dependence is a property of
the two tables, not of their columns, and should not go away just
because you reduce the parent to zero columns. I would expect that if
I dropped p.f1 (assuming this were allowed) and then added p.g1, that
c would also now have c.g1. So the parent/child relationship outlives
any specific column ... IMHO anyway.
regards, tom lane
