Boris van Schooten <schooten@cs.utwente.nl> writes:
> Looks good to me. I'd prefer to have a warning message (if (verbose)
> fprintf stderr) for each of the exceptional conditions though. I'm even
> so paranoid I prefer to have the verbose switch on by default.
Don't really see the need for it. What we are doing here is trusting to
the backend to error-check the input, rather than making a half-baked
attempt to do error checking in dbf2pg.
regards, tom lane
