Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date
Msg-id 22675.1581518808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
Responses Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> On 2/12/20 12:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> But we do actually release on calendar year.  While it seems not
>> unreasonable that we might fail to ship in time, that would likely lead
>> to one month, two months of delay.  Four months?  I don't think anybody
>> even imagines such a long delay.  It would be seen as utter,
>> unacceptable failure of our release team.

> It has actually happened once: PostgreSQL 9.5 was released in 2016-01-07.

Yeah; I don't think it's *that* unlikely for it to happen again.  But
my own principal concern about this mirrors what somebody else already
pointed out: the one-major-release-per-year schedule is not engraved on
any stone tablets.  So I don't want to go to a release numbering system
that depends on us doing it that way for the rest of time.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Support external parameters in EXECUTE command