Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id 227976.1686082840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> Since we're bikeshedding, "postgresql" or "builtin" could make it seem 
> to a (app) developer that these may be recommended options, as we're 
> trusting PostgreSQL to make the best choices for us. Granted, v16 is 
> (theoretically) defaulting to ICU, so that choice is made, but the 
> unsuspecting developer could make a switch based on that naming.

I don't think this is a problem, as long as any locale name other
than C/POSIX fails when combined with that provider name.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels