Re: IANA timezone abbreviations versus timezone_abbreviations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: IANA timezone abbreviations versus timezone_abbreviations
Date
Msg-id 2321184.1736472064@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IANA timezone abbreviations versus timezone_abbreviations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IANA timezone abbreviations versus timezone_abbreviations
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> 0003 is new work that fixes the pg_timezone_abbrevs view so
> that its output matches the new behavior.

Hmph ... the cfbot doesn't like that one bit.  It appears that the
"LMT" abbrev is known in my machine's system-provided tzdata tree,
but not when building our own timezone files.  I wonder if this is
exposing an existing bug (perhaps our copy of zic is too far out of
date?).  Will look into it tomorrow.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michail Nikolaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Log a warning in pg_createsubscriber for max_slot_wal_keep_size