Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
>> SELECT ... FROM (a cross join b) cross join c
> I'm not sure whether the above is the syntax you plan to use, but it looks
> a little too much like:
> SELECT ... FROM (select * from a cross join b) as z cross join c
> which has a quite different meaning to any kind of outer join,
Huh? AFAIK they mean exactly the same thing, modulo a few issues about
visibility of columns. In any case you'll have to take your complaint
to ISO, because that's what the spec says the syntaxes are.
> I don;t think that support for this kind of query is implemented,
Not yet, but it's certainly on the TODO list. I'm not seriously
thinking about getting subselect-in-FROM done in this go-round,
though.
regards, tom lane
