Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date
Msg-id 2552835.1715979949@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:51 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>> I think it is a good rule.  I don't think that it shouldn't lead to putting
>> people on the pillory or kicking their patches, but I imagine that a committer
>> looking for somebody else's patch to work on could prefer patches by people
>> who are doing their share of reviews.

> If you give me an automated way to find that out, I'll consider paying
> some attention to it.

Yeah, I can't imagine that any committer (or reviewer, really) is
doing any such thing, because it would take far too much effort to
figure out how much work anyone else is doing.  I see CFMs reminding
everybody that this rule exists, but I don't think they ever try to
check it either.  It's pretty much the honor system, and I'm sure
some folk ignore it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%
Next
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.