Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris
Date
Msg-id 25566.1159886922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG qsort vs. Solaris  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris
Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris
List pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
> Is it time to "remove" PG qsort and use libc version for solaris 9, 10...?

I have no particular desire to introduce a version number check until we
have to.  If you can show that the newer versions have a qsort that
substantially *out-performs* ours, it would be worth doing that, but
merely being competitive isn't enough to make it worth the trouble.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 error msg
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 error msg