Re: New Object Access Type hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date
Msg-id 2611318.1647988905@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: New Object Access Type hooks
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Mar 22, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Seems like it might actually be good to test that object access hooks work
>> well in a parallel worker. How about going the other way and explicitly setting
>> force_parallel_mode = disabled for parts of the test and to enabled for
>> others?

> Wouldn't we get differing numbers of NOTICE messages depending on how
> many parallel workers there are?  Or would you propose setting the
> number of workers to a small, fixed value?

The value would have to be "1", else you are going to have issues
with notices from different workers being interleaved differently
from run to run.  You might have that anyway, due to interleaving
of leader and worker messages.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Window Function "Run Conditions"
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER