Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 27169.1038768570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> PUBLIC doesn't seem like a very common column name --- seems safe to
> make it reserved.  We made 'value' reserved in 7.3, and that was a much
> more common one.

I'm still quite unhappy about 'value', and would like to look into
making it unreserved again.  This business does show that there are some
pitfalls in that, though :-(
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump