Re: buildfarm failure in XML code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: buildfarm failure in XML code
Date
Msg-id 27378.1171638554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm failure in XML code  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: buildfarm failure in XML code
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2007 14:59 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
>> UX:acomp: ERROR: "xml.c", line 2188: undefined symbol: INT64_MAX
>> UX:acomp: ERROR: "xml.c", line 2188: undefined symbol: INT64_MIN
>> 
>> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=warthog&dt=2007-02-1
>> 6%2009:06:01

> It needs a rebuild after the fix.

This "fix" doesn't fix anything.  We have always in the past managed to
avoid assuming that int64 actually is available; I don't intend to give
the xml code a free pass to break that, especially for such an utterly
marginal purpose as this code has.  I'm also wondering why xml.c is the
only place anywhere in the code that uses <stdint.h>.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Seneca Cunningham
Date:
Subject: Intermittent buildfarm failures due to timestamptz test
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Mail getting through? Short varlena headers