Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Date
Msg-id 2829.1492290578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> That seems quite reasonable.  I'm afraid we're going to have to figure
> out something similar, but more robust, for windows soon-ish :/

Why doesn't Windows' ability to map the segment into the new process
before it executes take care of that?

> As a minor point, it'd probably be good to add addr=%zu, requestedAddress
> or such.

Yeah, I'd come to the same conclusion right after sending that.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken