Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments
Date
Msg-id 2844202.1622569565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> When this discussion concludes a review of the compatibility sections of
> the create/drop “routine” reference pages would be appreciated.

Good idea, whichever answer we settle on.  But it's notable that
the existing text gives no hint that the rules are different
for functions and procedures.  That will need work if we leave
the code as it stands.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: return correct error code from pgtls_init
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: join pushdown and issue with foreign update