Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?)
Date
Msg-id 28813.1037772912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PORTS] Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom, can you clarify why -0 is valid.

The IEEE spec absolutely thinks that -0 and +0 are distinct entities.
I don't remember why, at one in the morning ... but if you insist I'm
sure that plenty sufficient numerical-analysis reasons can be produced.
The guys who wrote that spec knew what they were doing (that's why it's
been adopted so universally).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PREPARE and parameter types (Re: [INTERFACES] DBD::PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PREPARE and parameter types (Re: [INTERFACES] DBD::PostgreSQL)