Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 03/14/2017 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess, but to me the first one
>> is a prime example of crappy webdesign --- too busy, too convinced that
>> randomly colored backgrounds and legibility-killing font coloring choices
>> are great ideas.
> So I guess you're also not keen on gitweb's commitdiff display suggested
> nearby by Justin Clift?
Well, I find it a considerable improvement over github's, at least in this
example.
> Is there anyone else who wants to stick with the commit display instead
> of switching to commitdiff?
+1 for commitdiff, that's pretty much always the form of the page I want
to see.
regards, tom lane
