Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

es_BaseId/cs_base_id seem to be dead code? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject es_BaseId/cs_base_id seem to be dead code?
Date
Msg-id 29793.963171626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
AFAICT, the EState field es_BaseId and the CommonState field cs_base_id
are not used for anything, and so the plan-initialization code that
sets them is a complete waste of time.

Presumably these were once used for something, but I can't think of
any good reason not to remove them.  Does anyone see a reason to
keep them?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] MAX() of 0 records.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq / SQL3