Re: WITH HOLD and pooled connections - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WITH HOLD and pooled connections
Date
Msg-id 29904.1060374963@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to WITH HOLD and pooled connections  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah.  I'm leaning towards the idea that a protocol addition is what to
>> do.

> I am confused why a protocol change would be desired.

I was thinking that you might want it at a lower level than having to
issue a SQL command to get at the data.  A lot of what we changed in
the 7.4 protocol revision involved eliminating the need to use SQL
commands to get at information that a client library needs.

But see my later note questioning just how useful these features would
really be.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: UnixWare/Compiler Stuff
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH HOLD and pooled connections