On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Simon Riggs
<simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I don't think so, because this section of code is only called if there
is redo to perform. If no redo, we never get here.
OK. But why not open up the database for read-only access when there is no redo action to be done ? Or am I missing something trivial ?
Anyways, I will wait for your latest version to continue with the test/review.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
