Re: Problems with autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: Problems with autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0905250850j4c901c6br9bc26f2804bfaf37@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problems with autovacuum  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Problems with autovacuum
Re: Problems with autovacuum
List pgsql-performance
2009/5/25 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>:

>
> So, in 2000 databases, there's only an average of 2 relations per db
> and 102 dead rows?  Cause that's all you got room for with those
> settings.
>
> Whats the last 20 or so lines of vacuum verbose as run by a superuser say?

according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html
max_fsm_relations applies only to tables and indices, and it says "in
database", so I presume that means per database. In which case, those
settings are ok.
It would be nice, to see if vacuum actually complains about it.



--
GJ

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with autovacuum
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with autovacuum