Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date
Msg-id 2fb99632-9302-6509-78ce-3aaed3fd7f40@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Here is a new patch for this.  This now follows the implementation that 
Tom has suggested:  Leave date_part() alone, add a new set of extract() 
functions, and map the SQL EXTRACT construct to those.  I have basically 
just copied over the implementations from my previous patch and placed 
them next to the existing date_part() implementations.  So all the 
behavior is still the same as in the previous patches.

One thing I still need to look into is how to not lose all the test 
coverage for date_part().  But that should be fairly mechanical, so I'm 
leaving it off in this version.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP tests aren't using the magic words for Windows file access
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: On login trigger: take three