At 11:31 AM 2/7/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>I hate to see you give up on this.
>Don't tell me we fsync on every buffer write, and not just at
>transaction commit? That is terrible.
Won't we have many more options in this area, i.e. increasing performance
while maintaining on-disk data integrity, once WAL is implemented?
snapshot+WAL = your database so in theory -F on tables and
the transaction log would be safe as long as you have a snapshot and
as long as the WAL is being fsync'd and you have the disk space to
hold the WAL until you update your snapshot, no?
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
