Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000821065906.014e8e00@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)  (Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>)
Responses Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
List pgsql-hackers
At 10:22 PM 8/20/00 -0400, Ned Lilly wrote:
>If you all don't mind, I think it'd be great to keep this discussion on the
>list.  As some of you know, Great Bridge is working on its own project
>hosting site (including a PG-backed bug tracking module).  We're not quite
>ready to pull back the curtain yet, but are getting close, and will be
>actively soliciting input (and hacks) from the community.

So - again - why roll your own instead of build upon a base which at least
is already seeing some use, by some fairly large organizations (arsDigita
is larger and more deeply funded than Great Bridge, making profits to boot,
and I won't even start talking about AOL)?  arsDigita is putting some
developer
effort into the SDM, so it's no longer just Ben and whoever he can rope into
helping out.

Couldn't you guys more profitably spend time, say, working on outer joins
rather than doing something like this?

The folks working on the SDM have a LOT more web/db development experience
than whoever's rolling your bug tracking system.  

I keep sniffing the odor of NIH ...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan