Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lincoln Yeoh
Subject Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM?
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20010430112357.00965c80@192.228.128.13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM?  (GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>)
Responses Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM?
List pgsql-general
At 09:17 PM 29-04-2001 -0500, GH wrote:
>
>As it seems you know, PostgreSQL "leaves behind" the stagnant rows after
>an UPDATE or DELETE; it merely sets a flag (IIRC) to that effect.

OK. I read http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/aw_pgsql_book/node110.html

So the stagnant rows are for the other transactions.

I was hoping that there would be a way for queries to find rows quickly,
ignoring stagnant rows. e.g. maybe a subindex pointing to the latest row
with some info so that transactions know whether they should use the latest
or not (Not valid if your transaction started before... - with the usual
rollover issues ;) ). Something like that anyway.

Cheerio,
Link.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: GH
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM?
Next
From: GH
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do things slow down without a VACUUM?