On 15.01.25 08:11, vignesh C wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 19:08, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've also added a patch that addresses logical replication. It
>> basically adds back some of the prohibitions against including generated
>> columns in publications that have been lifted, but this time only for
>> virtual generated columns, and amends the documentation. It doesn't
>> rename the publication option "publish_generated_columns", but maybe
>> that should be done.
>
> There are two potential approaches we could take to address the
> "publish_generated_columns" option: a) We could support multiple
> values for publish_generated_columns, such as 'none', 'stored', and
> 'virtual', as Amit suggested in [1]. b) Alternatively, we could rename
> publish_generated_columns to publish_stored_generated_columns.
> Both options seem reasonable to me. Do you have a preference for which
> approach would be better?
I have a very weak preference for a).
