Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
Date
Msg-id 3240.1165006340@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The functionality in this area isn't yet complete anyway; we still have
> locking in the partitioned table case to consider.

Hm?  What does partitioning have to do with it?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks