Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f0511171150j24f2dd2bq607b69994338aa9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Responses Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
List pgsql-performance
Just pick up a SCSI drive and a consumer ATA drive.

Feel their weight.

You don't have to look inside to tell the difference.

Alex

On 11/16/05, David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org> wrote:
>
>
>  I suggest you read this on the difference between enterprise/SCSI and
> desktop/IDE drives:
>
> http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf
>
>
>  This is exactly the kind of vendor propaganda I was talking about
>  and it proves my point quite well : that there's nothing specific relating
>  to reliability that is different between SCSI and SATA drives cited in that
> paper.
>  It does have a bunch of FUD such as 'oh yeah we do a lot more
>  drive characterization during manufacturing'.
>
>
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (