Re: [HACKERS] Patch for glibc2 date problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Patch for glibc2 date problems
Date
Msg-id 34BEC300.F023392F@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for glibc2 date problems  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patch for glibc2 date problems
List pgsql-hackers
> The patch for glibc2 dates is attached.  With this applied, a Linux system
> with libc6 (glibc2) passes all the date and time related regression tests.

It looks as though this patch is a bit Linux-specific (or specific to some version of glibc which has only been tested
on
Linux).

Can we wait until glibc2 settles down, or provide this as an add-on patch rather than merging it into the main tree? I
hate
adding machine-specific code into otherwise general code...

Another possibility would be to add a new #define variable like HAVE_FUNNY_LIBRARY in config.h or in linux.h so we can
possibly use this with other ports if necessary in the future.

I'm planning on installing RH5.0 sometime soon (I have a clean disk so can fall back to RH4.2). I'm sure I'll sound
more
sympathetic by then  :)

                                                    - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "neil d. quiogue"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Arrays (inserting and removing)
Next
From: "Micha³ Mosiewicz"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff