Re: pg_dump --with-* options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date
Msg-id 350edd98-7e91-4b63-b393-ba8b681b0799@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump --with-* options  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.06.25 17:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 15:47 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> My initial guess was that --with-data can override --no-data.  That
>> would have been pretty standard "last option wins" behavior.  But
>> pg_dump rejects that.  Personally, I think that is kind of wrong.
> 
> Do we have other options that are order-sensitive?

I think most of them are.  For example:

psql -p 5432 -p 5433
initdb --data-checksums --no-data-checksums
postgres --shared-buffers=1GB --shared-buffers=2GB




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible