Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Date
Msg-id 36e682920611200707y5e15bd7ep2e5e5cd456ceae9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/19/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> How does Orafce allow for grammar extensions like what would be needed
> for SYSDATE to work? (Note no parens)

IIRC, it doesn't handle SYSDATE as that would require a change to the grammar.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor            | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: present working directory
Next
From: "Claudio Rossi"
Date:
Subject: Accessing shared memory in a proc_exit callback