On 1/2/26 4:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> A volatile on a non-pointer won't do you much good, I'm afraid. You need to
> make sure that the underlying value is read as a single 8 byte read, I don't
> see how this guarantees that, unfortunately.
Yeah, that was a quite big thinko. I have a attached a patch with the
thinko fixed but I am still not happy with it. I think I will try to use
atomics.h and see if that makes the code nicer to read.
Also will after that see what I can do about pageinspect.
Andreas
