Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
Date
Msg-id 376AFC6E.EF9B47F7@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?  (Jeff Hoffmann <jeff@remapcorp.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
List pgsql-hackers
> has something changed with r-tree indexes in 6.5?
> any ideas?

revision 1.29
date: 1999/05/31 19:32:47;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines: +61 -5
Generate a more specific error message when an operator used
in an index doesn't have a restriction selectivity estimator.

Tom, was there anything more here than the new elog error exit itself?
It used to ignore the missing estimator, or fail farther in to the
code?

> ps, is it just me, or do things seem a little dead around here today?

At your office, or on the list? Most of us were waiting for your
message ;)
                  - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?