Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word?
Date
Msg-id 37DDB9F5.9CCBF433@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is "isolation" a restricted word?  ("G. Anthony Reina" <reina@nsi.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > This table had no problems previously; has the word isolation been used
> > > somewhere else as a SQL word?
> > And it's mentioned in the HISTORY file as part of the MVCC
> > changes. They're a couple of these 'gotcha' words that are part of
> > the SQL standard, but hadn't yet been implemented before 6.5 that have
> > tripped up people.

btw, it *is* documented as an SQL92 reserved word and a Postgres
reserved word in the big docs in the chapter on "Syntax".
                      - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is "isolation" a restricted word?
Next
From: Andreas Zeugswetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions