Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules
Date
Msg-id 3814439.1728937014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Anyway, my thought was to merge this into the other patch series,
> but I didn't do that yet.

I'd forgotten about merging these two patches into the bigger
ecpg patch series.  Since there didn't seem to be any objection
to either, I went ahead and pushed them.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Consider the number of columns in the sort cost model
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Make foreach_ptr macro work in C++ extensions