Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > So what about this would not be considered public domain software?
> > > Something can not be both Copyrighted and in the public domain.
> >
> > Hmm. I've taken this on-list, just in case someone else has a comment.
> > But in the absence of alternate information, I'll just assume that we
> > are not public domain software. But I sure still have the feeling that
> > we are getting gypped by the legaleze.
>
> How about "free software" or "freely available"? As in "free to do
> whatever you want", not Free(tm) as in FSF. IMHO, "open source" sounds to
> buzzword-compliant these days.
How about simply "BSD licensed?"
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
