Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ed Loehr
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results
Date
Msg-id 389B00A9.45077CC0@austin.rr.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PC Week Labs benchmark results  (Timothy Dyck <Timothy_Dyck@zd.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I was disappointed this benchmark did not include database recovery
and reliability measurements.  Benchmarks ought to include the most
important characteristics of an RDBMS, and recovery/reliability is
certainly one of them.  People tend to try to "measure up" against
accepted benchmarks; as one currently suffering from apparent
reliability issues, the thought of decreased focus on reliability irks
me. 

Cheers,
Ed Loehr


Timothy Dyck wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody, I'm done my tests of PostgreSQL and Interbase.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Next
From: Patrick Welche
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem