Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC connection refused - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces
From | John Collins |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC connection refused |
Date | |
Msg-id | 38C070BC.EC353582@cs.umn.edu Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC connection refused ("Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>) |
Responses |
Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC connection refused
|
List | pgsql-interfaces |
I tried your suggestion, and I can connect to localhost at port 5432 as you show below, and I can log in to the other machine and telnet to birch, port 5432, over the network. In both cases it connects, and then disconnects as soon as I type something and send it; I don't get an error message as you show below, just the Connection closed by foreign host message. So, I tried my simple jdbc example, and I'm still getting the Connection refused error. Just for grins, I went back to birch and tried running the same code, in which the URL looks like "jdbc:postgresql://birch/coffeebreak". That works, even with the hostname rather than "localhost". I can't imagine there's anything out of the ordinary with these two machines. They're both vanilla RedHat systems, plugged into the same ethernet hub, static addresses, etc. It seemed like a good idea. Thanks. I'm still stumped. John Collins University of Minnesota Joe Shevland wrote: > Unsure if it will help, but try: > > > telnet localhost 5432 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost. > Escape character is '^]'. > > rubbish text I typed. > ^^ > > EInvalid packet lengthConnection closed by foreign host. > --- > > But instead try 'birch' or the IP address and see what > you get. But the pg_hba file looks fine as you've got it > I think. Maybe a red herring but check whether there's any > firewalling set up on the server that stops you from connecting. > > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of John Collins > Sent: Friday, 3 March 2000 9:41 AM > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org > Cc: Lamar Owen > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC connection refused > > Lamar Owen wrote: > > > John Collins wrote: > > > - postmaster is indeed being run with the -i flag. I think neither the > > > local jdbc or the remote pgaccess would work otherwise. Here's the line > > > from rc.d/init.d/postgres: > > > su -l postgres -c '/usr/bin/postmaster -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql' > > > - I've used every name I can think of, including the ip address, in the > > > URL above. I've used the port and I've not used the port. > > > - I've used netstat to check that postmaster is indeed listening on > > > 5432 > > > > > > I'm stumped. Thanks in advance for any assistance. > > > > Is there a line in PGDATA/pg_hba.conf allowing access to the remote > > client? > > > > PGDATA on the RPM installation that shipped with RedHat 6.1 is > > /var/lib/pgsql, BTW. > > Here's the tail end of the file /var/lib/pgsql/pg_hba.conf. I've restarted > twice since setting this info, using /etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql restart. > Then I tried a stop and a start just for good measure. The machines I'm > trying to connect from are both 192.168.2.x. Did I get this right? > > ------------------ > # By default, allow anything over UNIX domain sockets and localhost. > > local all trust > host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust > host all 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 trust > ------------------ > > Thanks for your help. > > John Collins > University of Minnesota > > ************
pgsql-interfaces by date: