Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Date
Msg-id 3944.1066752830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> We try to limit initdb in late betas --- that has always been our
> process.  I don't have any problem with the initdb, though.

We now have another reason to, which is Chris K-L's point about
unqualified names in the various SQL-language built-in functions.
I am about to commit that fix (with another catversion bump for
good measure...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yann Michel
Date:
Subject: suspicius behaviour during delete
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?