Re: Patch for better large objects support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date
Msg-id 3945FC8B.CF71D09@bitmead.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for better large objects support  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for better large objects support
List pgsql-patches
Denis Perchine wrote:

> > > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > > way around.
> >
> > Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?
>
> Because data is stored in relations, and there's extra overhead for managing them.
> Just look on Jan's mail in [HACKERS] for better description of the difference.

According to Tom's last email, current LOs are stored in relations now.

--
Chris Bitmead
mailto:chris@bitmead.com

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Next
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support